|
This morning is the first annual auction
service sermon. At last February's auction, Cecilia Kloecker won the auction
sermon, and she chose the topic of "humor". Cecilia's sense was that we take
ourselves too seriously and that we could use a sermon on humor. Today we
honor the place of humor in religion, faith, and life.
The great theologian Reinhold Niebuhr
writes "Humor is, in fact, a prelude to faith; and laughter is the beginning
of prayer." What does Niebuhr mean by this? I have a story to illustrate his
point, a story about a time not so long ago when I thought that faith,
religion, ministry and prayer was only serious business.
My ministry did not begin with laughter.
Although certain of my calling, I was uncertain about Unitarian
Universalism, insecure about my length of time with the association, and
terrified of being a woman in ministry. My fears and uncertainties had made
me deadly serious. This changed when I became intern at the First Parish in
Concord, Massachusetts and met the senior minister, the Reverend Gary E.
Smith.
Gary is the person who showed me how to
minister to myself and others with humor. I have always loved to laugh, but
I just didn't believe humor and laughter was applicable to ministry and
religion. I believed that faith was a serious thing. Gary proved me wrong at
every turn.
Gary is a very intense man, the senior
minister of a congregation with over 700 adults, and Gary loves a good joke.
I'd say he thrives on a good joke. He might even survive on a good joke. On
Sunday mornings I discovered that he liked to sing falsetto on the closing
hymn. Never a great singer, his falsetto was outrageous. When he discovered
that I couldn't contain my laughter over this habit of his, he would
intentionally stand closer to me during the hymn and lean in when it got
really bad. In the receiving line people would ask me "Why were you laughing
up there?"
He was delighted that in previous years he
caused the former associate minister, Beth Graham, great consternation on
Sunday mornings by telling her things like she had toilet paper on her
shoes, or that her skirt was tucked into her hose. When I began interviewing
for ministry positions his advice to me on meeting with Search Committees
was this, "Imagine them in their underwear, Sharon (which by the way,
works)!" And then there was the joke to end all jokes. The joke he played on
me that changed my idea of ministry and humor for good.
Few things have brought me as much terror
in my life as facing the credentialing body of the UUA, the Ministerial
Fellowship Committee (or MFC). My interview was scheduled for the February I
was at Concord, and like most of my classmates, I had begun studying the
June before. By January my nerves were stretched, and I had acquired a
special, irrational fear about questions on UU history, a fear that I
mentioned to Gary.
One day Gary went out to lunch with the
Reverend David Pohl, a member at First Parish who is also the former
Director of the Department of Ministry at the UUA. The Reverend Pohl is
greatly respected and a kind, and committed man. To me he fully represented
the weight of the UUA and MFC. After lunch Gary and David returned. Gary
came to get me and said "Sharon, David wants to see you before your MFC
interview."
I went out to talk to David and he said
"Sharon, I think you'll do just fine, but I want to ask you a question to
see if you are ready." Given the events that followed this question, I truly
can't remember it anymore. It went something like "Who was the first
Unitarian minister in Transylvania?", and then David listed four possible
names. In a moment of blinding panic I realized I didn't recognize any of
his four names (which was my worst nightmare), and that I would fail my MFC
interview. I stammered out "I don't know." At this point Gary was almost
jumping up and down in the hallway. "Don't you get it, Sharon, none of them
are, and the MFC is never going to ask you that question."
David left, Gary confessed to twisting his
arm to do such a thing, and I proceeded to pay Gary back by immediately
going into our supervisory session and crying uncontrollably for the next
hour. In fact, I couldn't stop crying. I was mad at Gary for a few minutes.
He apologized, realizing that he had gone beyond my ability to tolerate a
joke, but soon even I could even see that it was funny.
The only reason I ever fell for this joke
was because I was locked into an irrational, paralyzing fear that removed
any room for the possibility of humor, and with it, all chance for faith and
life. Quite ironic. My growing humorlessness was killing me and my approach
to ministry. Gary's joke let loose all my terror, frustration, and
stagnation. It was utterly cathartic. On the day of my real MFC interview I
sailed through, largely because I had already faced my worst fear with
humor, and survived, thanks to humor. Today I believe ministry and life are
unbearable without humor, and I seek humor at every turn.
Reinhold Niebuhr writes,
Humor is, in fact, a prelude to faith;
and laughter is the beginning of prayer. [He goes on] Laughter must be
heard in the outer courts of religion; and the echoes of it should
resound in the sanctuary; but there is no laughter in the holy of
holies. There laughter is swallowed up in prayer and humour is fulfilled
by faith."
I agree with Niebuhr until the end, and
this is what I learned from Gary. There is laughter in the holy of holies.
There is a desperate need for laughter in the holy of holies. Of all things,
we must be able to also laugh at and with what we hold most dear, what we
want most desperately, what pains us the most, what we value the highest.
Of course there is a time and place for
laughter and humor. In his book, The Courage to Laugh: Humor, Hope, and
Healing in the Face of Death and Dying, Allen Klein writes about
laughter as both hope and true communication because it takes our minds off
things and connects us to one another. (I strongly recommend this book to
anyone coping with their own illness or death, or that of a loved one. It's
truly outstanding with lots of accessible and comfortable stories, great
quotes and powerful insights.) Klein maintains that one of the most
important gifts we can give someone who is ill, is actually the permission
to laugh. He also has some important qualifiers, humor isn't appropriate at
all times, people need to feel respected and listened to before they can
appreciate humor, humor can be misused to mask important feelings, and it is
crucial to understand an individual's threshold for humor.
Klein's caveats are very important and
they helped me understand Gary's joke on me. In many ways Gary crossed my
threshold for humor on that topic at that time, yet I always knew that he
respected me and listened to me, so that made the joke bearable, then funny,
then transformative. Today I am only grateful that Gary played this joke on
me (this one joke transformed me, and only because it was so shocking did it
snap me out of a dead end street), but I only want so many heart-stopping
moments in my life. The threshold of humor can be a mysterious place and we
do well to tread with caution until we know one another well.
There is also a difference between types
of humor. Sarcasm is anger, not humor, and it wounds. Irony and satire can
be fun, enlightening, painful, or cruel. The genius of humor is wit,
spontaneity, acceptance, resistance, truth-telling, gentle
self-depreciation, and that which makes us laugh and feel good about
ourselves and others (and in this moment I am reminded of the late, great
Steve Allen).
In this book Klein quotes a story by Dr.
Rachel Naomi Remen. I like this story because it is strange yet it has all
those good qualities of humor, wit, spontaneity, acceptance, resistance,
truth-telling, gentle self-depreciation, and it empowers both the giver and
the receiver. Remen tells the story of a man who has angrily struggled
through cancer at a young age. He has lost a leg, yet he learns to accept
his loss through helping others. Remen writes about this man:
Once he visited a young woman who was
almost his own age. It was a hot day in Palo Alto and he was in running
shorts so his artificial leg showed when he came into her hospital room.
The woman was so depressed about the loss of both her breasts that she
couldn't even look at him, wouldn't pay any attention to him. . . So,
desperate to get her attention, he unstrapped his leg and began dancing
around the room on one leg, snapping his fingers to the music. She
looked at him in amazement, and then she burst out laughing and said,
"Man, if you can dance, I can sing."
I love this story, because it is about
survivors helping one another. Several years earlier the young man would
have been too angry, to self-focused to help this woman. But as time passed
and acceptance grew, he was able to see himself not as a victim, but as a
whole person subject to the pain and whim of life, yet still full of
strength and power.
There's a good chance that only someone
who had felt such anger and betrayal of the body, could have help someone
now feeling the same thing. I am certain that his ability to dance on one
leg was astonishing for him and also transcendent. It speaks of his
liberation and power, and then he was blessed with the opportunity to share
this with someone who needed to know that there could be freedom and joy in
her future as well. Humor is a prelude to faith, faith in the possibility of
life. And laughter is a prayer, a gift, a blessing, sacred.
Within Hinduism one of the most popular
gods is Krishna. Now Krishna has many images, but the most popular is
Krishna as a careless, playful, mischievous child, the butter thief.
Krishna's actions are solely for the purposes of self-delight and it is no
coincidence that Hindus are drawn to this image of a god. The Bengalis say
of him "Without Krsna there is no song". Scholar David R. Kinsley explains:
[Krsna] embodies all those things that
are extra in life, all those luxuries and characteristics that are not
necessary to life but without which life would not be worth living . . .
Here God plays, losing himself in ecstatic, spontaneous revelry. Here
life is a celebration, not a duty. Here life does not grind along but
scampers in dance and rejoices in song.
This image of Krishna has always
fascinated me. Leave it to the Hindus, with their polytheistic pantheon, to
understand that there must be laughter in life to make it bearable. Krishna
lives to play. He even defeats his demon enemies in play. Humor, laughter,
play. Hindus understand and honor its place in life. "Without Krsna there is
no song." I'm not sure we understand this quite as well in America. To begin
with, our Western interpretations of the Bible and religion are fairly
serious.
I was hard-pressed to think of "funny"
moments in the Bible. What I think of as humor in Western interpretations of
the Bible are passages like Paul's reference to "the foolishness" of
Christians for having faith. But this is a sort of submissive, ironic type
of humor that is very obviously instructional. This is no belly laugh. This
is no silliness for the sake of being silly and loving life. This is what
Niebuhr is reflecting in his words. Niebuhr is wise enough to realize that
there is humor in religion, but he can't quite place it in the holy of
holies. That's not what we have been taught.
In his book, And God Created Laughter:
The Bible as Divine Comedy, Conrad Hyers makes a fairly good case for
the presence of humor in the Bible. Hyers points out that humor and jokes
are the first things lost in translations. He notes that the Bible has been
translated from Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek, and that much of the humor has
been lost. I'm not saying that the Bible is a laugh riot, but the ancient
Hebrews loved a good play on words, and good word play brings with it great
subtlety, wit, and playfulness. Hyers maintains that we can easily find this
humor in the Bible if we look for it.
Hyers uses the Hebrew Scripture
story of Abraham and Sarah to illustrate his point. Historically Abraham and
Sarah are the parents of the people of Israel. In the Book of Genesis
we are first told that Abraham and Sarah are both old and that although they
wished for children, they have been unable to have any. Then Abraham is told
by God that he will bear a son. He laughs, as does Sarah when she hears the
news.
A year later though a son is born and God
says "you will call his name Isaac [Isaac, which means 'he laughs' or
'laughter' in Hebrew']" ( Gen. 17:19). . . Abraham gave the name [Laughter]
to the son Sarah bore him. When his son [Laughter] was eight days old,
Abraham circumcised him, as God commanded him. Abraham was a hundred years
old when his son [Laughter] was born to him" (Gen. 21:3-5). As Hyers
explains, the history of Israel begins . . . with a joke, a divine joke.
Abraham laughs, Sarah laughs, God laughs. Sarah says "God has made laughter
for me; every one who hears will laugh over me" (Gen. 21:6).
I often hear this story interpreted as
Sarah laughs at God, God gets mad at her, and as a sort of "punishment" the
child is named Isaac. There are a couple of things I don't like about this
interpretation. First, it's utterly humorless. Second, if God "blames" Sarah
for laughing, God must not be all-knowing because God ignores that Abraham
laughs too. It's right there in the scripture. Beyond that, I have never
seen the name "Isaac" or his birth story as one of punishment. This is a
story about hope, miracles, humor, and the uncontrollable mysteries of life.
This is a story about an older couple struggling with infertility and yet
the story of Isaac is symbolic for more than the difficult conception and
then miraculous birth of a child.
On a symbolic level, Isaac (or laughter)
is not a child at all, but an understanding or wisdom about humor that
Abraham and Sarah acquire in their old age. God tells Abraham he will make a
covenant with Isaac. God covenants with laughter, or "he who laughs" and a
nation is born. "I will establish my covenant with [laughter] as an
everlasting covenant for his descendants after him" (gen. 17:19). First
there is despair, then laughter, then life is born. This story tells us that
laughter brings hope and a new beginning, and that God just might have an
excellent sense of humor, especially in the holy of holies.
Hyers concludes his book by noting that
our unnecessary religious lack of humor has hurt us in other ways as well.
He notes that we like to cling to tragic interpretations of things instead
of embracing the comic. He writes:
One of the flaws in the tragic vision is
that each side tends to absolutize itself and cling stubbornly to its
position, regardless of the consequences to life and property. The truths
and rights to which each makes claim are beyond qualification and
compromise. Any differing claims must be resolutely denied . . When human
beings lose all sense of the comic in relation to themselves, their
convictions, and their suspicions, tragic collisions are inevitable. Only
insofar as we learn to take our ideologies and beliefs less absolutely,
our self-image less seriously, do we have a chance of softening tragic
extremes and tragic extremism. If nothing else, people who have a refined
sense of humor about themselves are less inclined to kill one another.
They may even be more disposed to love one another.
While adding this quote into the sermon I
couldn't help but think of our bizarre Presidential election. Last week I
watched the television show 48 Hours, and Dan Rather interviewed a
constitutional scholar who was hysterical in his interpretation of the
Presidential election. When asked about constitutional issues he immediately
stretched the situation out to the worst possible conclusion, the electoral
college couldn't vote in December and America would have no new President in
January. He was almost ecstatic.
Can we take our ideologies and beliefs a
little less absolutely, and ourselves a little less seriously? I compare
this to our own Dick Bozian who recently offered me these sage words
regarding the election, "Well, we've survived Herbert Hoover." Now here is
humor and perspective.
Whatever side of the political fence you
are on, the point is that we will most likely be just fine if we can take
our ideologies and ourselves a little less seriously and find some humor.
There are people in America who are seriously concerned about the ethics of
President Clinton. There are people in America seriously concerned about the
future of civil rights if George W. Bush is elected President.
Ethics and civil rights are not laughing
matters, but if we can't also find ways to laugh about this situation,
ourselves and our values, we will collapse under the anxiety. We will become
entrenched in anxiety, fear, and extremism and we will not be able to help
our country. Has it occurred to anyone else here that at this point there is
a good chance that the candidate and party who will be the winner is the one
who graciously steps down for the good of the country, and that this is just
a little bit funny? We have survived Herbert Hoover.
All my life I have enjoyed funny people,
not really comedians, they seem too pre-meditated, too calculated for me,
but people who know how to see and name humor as it happens. Here at First
Church I think of people like Rick Boydston, Dick Bozian, Adam Gerhardstein,
Carol Lloyd, Jim Percival, Tommie Thompson. I think of these people because
more than once I have been with them when they found the humor in a
situation. To each of them I am grateful for making me laugh, for making
many of us laugh, for guiding us away from extremes, absolutes and burdened
self-images.
Life needs humor, especially when the
stakes are the highest, and the potential for loss is the greatest. To this
beloved community gathered here I wish a ministry of humor, humor to deal
with committee misunderstandings, worship snafus, matters of family and the
heart, canvass calls, parking lot votes, reconciliation projects, social
justice and mission statement endeavors.
Our life here is important. So important
that we need to develop a kind sense of humor so that we may live and work
and help and heal and love one another and this world of which we are a
part. Our laughter is sacred and we desperately need it in that which each
of us calls the holy of holies. May we be blessed with the gift of humor in
times of joy and especially when confusion and distress reign supreme. May
it always be so.
Reading
One of the flaws in the tragic vision is
that each side tends to absolutize itself and cling stubbornly to its
position, regardless of the consequences to life and property. The truths
and rights to which each makes claim are beyond qualification and
compromise. Any differing claims must be resolutely denied… When human
beings lose all sense of the comic in relation to themselves, their
convictions, and their suspicions, tragic collisions are inevitable. Only
insofar as we learn to take our ideologies and beliefs less absolutely, our
self-image less seriously, do we have a chance of softening tragic extremes
and tragic extremism. If nothing else, people who have a refined sense of
humor about themselves are less inclined to kill one another. They may even
be more disposed to love one another.
|