|
Dead Man
Walking
is one of the most disturbing books I have ever read. Written by Sister Helen Prejean in 1993, the book tells the
true story about her experiences as a spiritual advisor to two death row
inmates, Patrick Sonnier and Robert Willie.
The book is utterly devastating, both in its description of the
crimes committed by these two men and the unbearable burdens these crimes
place on loved ones and friends, as well as its unremitting description of
the countdown to death, and ultimately the approximately four minutes it
takes to kill these men in the electric chair.
I finished this book in two days, and at the end I
was overwhelmed. My heart was
so full that I could not write. If
I had been a character in an opera, I would have burst into a tormented
aria something along the lines of "My heart is severed by the cavern
of human cruelty."
When
I finished this book, there was only one thing I wanted to do, go pick up
my son at day care so I could look at his smiling face to see that life is
good. There was one other
thing, pray. I prayed in a
way I don't even believe in, I prayed for a specific thing.
I prayed that no one as unexplainably, randomly cruel as Patrick or
Robert would ever touch my son on a "bad night", and that my son
would never do something the state believes is cause for his execution.
The United States has been deadlocked on the issue of
capital punishment, killing someone as punishment for crimes committed,
for decades now. There was a
ten year moratorium between 1967 and 1977, when no executions took place
in the United States. During
this time the question of whether or not capital punishment is cruel and
unusual punishment (in terms of the United States Constitution) and should
therefore be abolished, was strenuously fought in the courts.
But since the late 1970's the practice of capital punishment has
rolled onward, particularly in the so-called southern "Death
Belt" states, Louisiana, Georgia, Florida, and Texas, where according
to Sister Prejean, two-thirds of all U. S. executions take place.
Prior to reading Dead
Man Walking I was reluctant to give a sermon on the death penalty.
It's not that I am undecided, for a long time I have believed that
capital punishment is cruel and unusual, and not an answer for crime.
I could give you all the statistical and logical reasons for this,
and I will later, but not just yet, because I want to get to why this
sermon is different, special, not a debate club topic or political speech,
not a study on ethics or crime, but a sermon, an exploration of cruelty,
loss, love, forgiveness, and redemption.
This year our worship theme is worship and the arts.
At least once a month we are using the arts as a vessel to
challenge, deepen, and inspire our faith, to move us, to take us beyond
what we know, to provide a pastoral or prophetic voice on some theme.
The 1993 book, then 1995 movie, and recently released 2000 opera Dead
Man Walking, all abundantly qualify as the prophetic voice of art.
But not just prophetic, something deeper, more powerful, shining
light on this cavern of humanity, crime and capital punishment.
One member of the congregation wrote to me after seeing the opera,
Dead Man Walking, which played in Cincinnati this past summer.
He wrote:
I found that the
death penalty, like abortion, is something that people have pretty
engrained views about. By
using the opera – the arts – to explore the tragedy of both sides,
Sister Helen really does a wonderful job of challenging our views and
moving us to action.
Another member wrote to me and said:
The musical theme was the same at the
beginning when the murders occurred, and at the end when the state was
killing the murderer. Opera
was a way to tell the story without having to use words to spell out the
tragedy - allowing each of us to develop our own feelings as it went
along.
More
compelling than all the statistics is the story of individual people.
The art of literature, film, and opera tell this story in all its
complexity and pain, drawing out the themes of violence, rage, cruelty,
punishment, grief, love, and forgiveness, and allowing us, the reader and
viewer to struggle with moral questions instead of arguing over
statistics. As Joshua Kosman
writes in his review of the opera:
[The creator's] treatment of this material is focused
on what opera has always done best: exploring the emotional journeys of
people under great duress . . . To some observers, the opera's failure to
take a more forceful and explicit stand against the death penalty is
nothing less than a failure of nerve.
But the truth is that nothing could be more foreign to the world of
opera than that kind of overarching moral stridency.
Like the questioning woman [Sister Helen Prejean] at its center, Dead Man Walking knows just where its moral priorities lie: in the
essential but elusive virtues of love and forgiveness.
But the point of the opera is not so much to preach in favor of
them as to illuminate just how difficult it is for any human being to
attain those spiritual goals.
Although
I did not see the opera, I have listened to it, and both the opera and the
book had this same effect on me, illuminating the pain of the situation
and complexity of emotions, challenging me on many fronts.
Sister Helen Prejean is an ardent opponent of the death penalty,
based on her faith as a Christian and avocation as a nun helping the poor
and marginalized. Certainly
in her book she presents compelling statistics on the death penalty, but
again more than the numbers, it was the stories that stayed with me,
illuminating the challenge of love, forgiveness, and peace in the face of
violent crime. The movie and opera tell variations on the book.
For the purposes of this sermon I am going to rely on the story
from the book.
Sister Helen Prejean moved to New Orleans in the
early 1980s to work with the inner city poor.
Shortly thereafter she was asked to become a penpal with a death
row inmate. She agreed,
seeing it as part of her mission to the poor and marginalized.
Noting the preponderance of black death row inmates in Louisiana,
she assumes she will be paired with a black man.
Instead she is given the name of Elmo Patrick Sonnier, a white
Cajun from a small town in central Louisiana.
In 1977 Patrick Sonnier and his brother Eddie
kidnapped a teenage couple, Loretta Bourque and David LeBlanc, from a
popular lover's lane, assaulted Loretta, and then killed both Loretta and
David. Previous to the
murders, the Sonnier brothers had kidnapped other young couples at this
lovers lane spot by posing as security guards.
In those instances they had assaulted the females and disappeared. I tell you about this crime because it haunts me.
It is calculated. It is cruel. It
is violent. It shows an utter
disregard for the sanctity of Loretta's and David's lives.
Throughout her association with Patrick, Sister Helen
struggles with Patrick's crime and the havoc it wreaks on the Bourque and
LeBlanc families. I began
this book disapproving of the death penalty.
Experiencing the grief of the families, I thought twice.
I truly thought twice. Their
pain and the burden of their loss is off the scale to all but those of us
who have experienced violent crime that ends in murder.
Their experience is one of my worst nightmares.
As Sister Prejean tells the story of serving as
spiritual advisor to Sonnier through his appeals and ultimately execution,
members of the LeBlanc and Bourque families are there every step of the
way, reliving the crime, their loss, the end of their innocence, the death
of their children. Dead Man Walking reminds us that any true death penalty dialogue
must also focus on the devastation of the survivors. It would be inhuman, cruel, to ignore their pain, or the
space they rightfully occupy in this issue.
This is a reality that statistics don't measure, but that art
illuminates. You can't
numerically address the murder of a loved one, the absence they occupy in
the lives of the survivors. And
as the book, film, and opera show us, the survivors are first, the victims
family, and then ultimately, the family of the executed prisoner. As Joshua Kosman writes,
In
some of the most wrenching scenes of the entire opera, it gives us
portraits of both the victims' parents and [the executed prisoner's]
widowed mother-a constellation of parents divided by everything in the
world except for their grief and bereavement.
The
sextet at the end of Act I is extraordinary, with all the parents singing. The mother of the inmate sings, "I failed you."
The parents of the victims agonize in remembering their last words
to their children "Comb your hair," "Fix your blouse."
All Sister Prejean can say is "I'm sorry, so sorry."
In the book Dead
Man Walking Sister Prejean writes that the Bourque family cannot sit
behind teenagers at church because the father, Lloyd, can't bear to look
at the back of teenager's heads (his son was shot in the back of the
head). Another father, Vernon
Harvey, attends the execution of his daughter, Faith's, murderer (Robert
Willie) with seeming delight and then proceeds to drive to Angola State
Prison for years thereafter to be present at the execution of other death
row inmates. Sister Prejean writes of a meeting with Vernon:
He [Vernon] just can't get over Faith's death, he
says. It happened six years
ago but for him it's like yesterday, and I realize that now, with Robert
Willie dead, he doesn't have an object for his rage.
He's been deprived of that too.
I know that he could watch Robert killed a thousand times and it
could never assuage his grief. He
had walked away from the execution chamber with his rage satisfied but his
heart empty. No, not even his
rage satisfied, because he still wants to see Robert Willie suffer and he
can't reach him anymore. He
tries to make a fist and strike out but the air flows through his fingers.
To
me, this is one of the saddest passages of all, the desperation and
desolation of grief, and the ultimate futility of capital punishment, and
again, there is no number that can calculate this futility.
Something like 46 out of 50 states now have the option of life
without parole, that is, any criminal can receive a life sentence, and
never, never have the chance for parole.
This is a permanent life sentence appropriate for these crimes.
The Death Penalty Information Center conducted a
survey that shows that 66% of Americans support capital punishment.
When this same group was asked if they supported capital punishment
if there was the option of life without parole, support dropped to 50%.
Add to this the fact that the actual execution of a prisoner,
including court challenges, costs more than it would to house someone in
prison for life, and there is even less logical incentive for the death
penalty. But the death
penalty is not about logic, it is about emotion, about vengeance,
retribution, and fear.
I would never presume to tell a family that has
survived a violent crime how to feel.
I would never suggest to Vernon Harvey that he just "get over
it." I would never tell
Lloyd LeBlanc that now all teenagers are his teenage son and he should
happily sit behind them in church. We
have no right to tell these survivors how to grieve or mourn, or forgive,
even if we could, because they are like volcanoes of grief, deserving of
our kindness and space. Yet I
think Sister Prejean speaks accurately when she writes that Vernon could
watch Willie killed a thousand times and it would never assuage his grief.
I think that use of the death penalty acknowledges
just one thing, our bottomless grief.
Our hearts are broken that humanity can be so cruel.
I don't believe that the death penalty is an answer to pain.
I don't believe that it is an answer to prevention or safety.
As one former public defender said to me "People kill because
they don't value life. Period."
I don't believe that capital punishment is an answer
to justice. Fifty percent of
all murder victims are white, yet 83% of capital cases involve white
victims. Although African
Americans make up approximately 20% of the population, 43% of death row
inmates are black, 9% are Hispanic.
Any lawyer who works in the system will tell you that a
disproportionate number of black men (as opposed to white men) are
sentenced to die, and that the likelihood of a death sentence is increased
if the victim is white.
Although Dead
Man Walking involves white families, victims, and perpetrators, at
the end of the book Sister Prejean will meet with a New Orleans family
survivor group and discover that of the forty members, only one will see
the killer of their loved one brought to trial.
The reason, both the survivor families and killers are black, and
law enforcement has been historically unconcerned about black on black
crime.
And as far as blind justice, even Dead
Man Walking address this. Patrick
Sonnier committed his crimes with his brother, Eddie.
Patrick is executed, Eddie receives life in prison.
Patrick and Eddie are both poor, and as is so often the case, those
who are poor often get less experienced, less persuasive, less powerful,
sometimes less motivated or caring lawyers.
Patrick's first lawyer is just such a lawyer. By the end of the book Patrick's second lawyer, who is much
more skilled, makes a clear case that Patrick, while obviously a
participant and responsible, was not the murderer.
Even Eddie says this is true, and although we tend to
doubt those convicted, and it is plausible that Sister Prejean is biased,
I came away virtually certain that Eddie pulled the trigger, not Patrick,
and yet Patrick was executed and Eddie lives.
Our justice system is not fair and equal. Money, power, race are all primary factors in who is
sentenced to death row, who gets life, and who is acquitted. The crime is secondary.
This does not make me feel safe.
This past week I spoke to David Singleton, director
of the Prison Reform Advocacy Center.
He said "If you can dehumanize you can execute. The nightmare
is that we may have executed innocent people.
Should we have a system that allows this?"
According to the Death Penalty Information Center, since 1973
ninety death row inmates have been released because new information, often
scientific, exonerated them.
For me, the horror of crime and capital punishment is
the same, people execute because they don't value life, whether the
executioner is a criminal or the state.
Since reading Dead Man
Walking I am struggling to value all human life.
Patrick Sonnier had remorse for his crime from the time he first
entered Angola until his execution years later.
I'm not saying he spoke easily of it or that he was consumed with
guilt and grief, but he had a clear awareness that what he did was wrong.
But I am deeply troubled that he repeatedly kidnapped and assaulted
teenagers.
And Robert Willie was even more troubling to me.
I'm not sure he was sorry. He
might have just been sorry he was caught (more like the character in the
opera). This does not make me
feel safe either. Dead
Man Walking has me deeply troubled about the potential for human
evil.
As Unitarian Universalists we value the inherent
worth and dignity of every person. I
am having trouble uplifting the good, when the bad is so devastating.
I come within a hair's breath of calling these men evil,
socio-paths, but I don't think that I can without it taking away from what
I believe is ultimately good, both in myself and humanity.
To call someone inherently evil begins the process of
dehumanization both in myself and others.
Sister
Helen's story shows us that these men have families, they love, they hurt,
they fear, they hope. They
are human. Sister Prejean
writes of this exchange with Patrick Sonnier:
"I have never known real love," he says,
"never loved women or anybody all that well myself.
I gave Mama a lot of trouble and Eddie was always her 'baby.'
She always loved her 'baby' and it's not that I blame her.
It's a shame a man has to come to prison to find love."
He looks up at me and says, "Thanks for loving me," but I
feel guilty that so much love has been lavished on me.
In the face of this man's utter poverty, I feel humbled.
I
am so touched by the poignancy that Patrick was never loved, never knew
love. And here is the
complexity. The crime
remains, and so does his man's humanity.
If some people are destructively flawed, behave
evilly, is there not some part of them, not matter how small or blunted,
still deserving of worth and dignity, at least to be fed, sheltered, to
live in safety? I am afraid I
would become my enemy if I act like my enemy.
I don't want to continue the cycle of pain and destruction. And yet I do believe in punishment. The sentence of life without parole is vital because people
like Patrick Sonnier and Robert Willie can be so destructive.
I take away two equally disturbing memories from Dead
Man Walking, the pain of the families (underscoring the horror of
their dead loved ones and their last moments alive) and Sister Prejean's
description of the executions, the preparations (shaving hair on the head,
wearing a diaper, the burn marks on the skin, the length of time it takes,
no one really knows if it is painless even if it is a lethal injection).
And it is the state, our government carrying out this last death.
In our state sanctioned execution, have we just
become the last victim of the crime, desensitized just a little more,
dehumanizing a people just a little more?
As one congregant remembered about the opera, "The musical
theme was the same at the beginning when the murders occurred, and at the
end when the state was killing the murderer."
Sister Prejean writes "The death penalty costs
too much. Allowing our
government to kill citizens compromises the deepest moral values upon
which this country was conceived: the inviolable dignity of human
persons."
Sister Prejean talks about her struggles with the
clear fact that in several places the Bible states that the punishment for
murder is death. "You
shall give life for life, eye for eye." (Exodus
21) She goes on to note that
it is important to read these passages though in context, that the Bible
was written during a violent time, that the Bible also calls for the
punishment of death in cases of contempt of parents, adultery, profaning
the sabbath, prostitution, and yet, these are not punishments we enact for
these behaviors today.
Sister
Prejean writes that she finds discussions about the death penalty based on
Biblical texts to be futile, biblical quarterbacking she calls it.
Someone says "an eye for an eye", she responds "Let
him without sin cast the first stone", and on it goes back and forth.
She explains:
I find myself steering away from such futile
discussions. Instead I try to
articulate what I personally believe about Jesus and the ethical thrust he
gave to humankind: an impetus toward compassion, a preference for
disarming enemies without humiliating and destroying them, and a
solidarity with poor and suffering people.
Dead Man Walking is an all too real labyrinth of human sorrow and destruction, beyond
the numbers and logic, it gets at the driving force of capital punishment,
pain, unremitting, overwhelming pain, cruelty, loss, and injustice.
I have not yet forgiven Sonnier and Willie for their crimes.
I don't know if I will but I think, I know in fact, I will have to
in time so that I can continue to embrace life.
A walk with Sister Prejean has already reinforced my belief that
although their crimes revoked their right to freely live in society,
Patrick Sonnier and Robert Willie were human beings deserving dignity and
respect, including the sanctity of their lives.
Sister Prejean counsels both Sonnier and Willie that
they have a choice on how they leave this world (this is the benefit of a
spiritual advisor), with either love or hatred. When asked if he has last words on the day of execution
Robert Willie says:
I would just like to say, Mr. and Mrs. Harvey, that I
hope you get some relief from my death.
Killing people is wrong. That's
why you've put me to death. It
makes no difference whether it's citizens, countries, or governments.
Killing is wrong.
When
asked if he has last words on the day of his execution Patrick says,
"Mr. LeBlanc, I don't want to leave this world with any hatred in my
heart, I want to ask your forgiveness for what me and Eddie done, but
Eddie done it."
He then looks at Sister Prejean and says "I love you,"
and she responds, "I
love you too" before the hood was pulled over his face.
The essential and elusive virtues of love and
forgiveness. How difficult it
is to attain these spiritual goals. Sister
Prejean has managed both. I'm
working towards it. Can
others manage this, even those more closely hurt?
At least one person can, Lloyd LeBlanc, David's father, who along
with Sister Prejean has taught me once again how to pray.
At the end of the book Sister Prejean tells us that
Lloyd prays for his family, for the Bourques, for David and Loretta, and
years later also the Sonniers, Pat, Eddie, and their mother.
She writes:
Lloyd LeBlanc has told me that he would have been
content with imprisonment for Patrick Sonnier.
We went to the execution, he says, not for revenge, but hoping for
an apology. Patrick Sonnier
had not disappointed him. Before
sitting in the electric chair he had said, "Mr. LeBlanc, I want to
ask your forgiveness for what me and Eddie done," and Lloyd LeBlanc
had nodded his head, signaling a forgiveness he had already given.
He says that when he arrived with sheriff's deputies there in the
cane field to identify his son, he had knelt by his boy-"laying down
there with his two little eyes sticking out like bullets"-and prayed
the Our Father. And when he
came to the words: "Forgive us our trespasses as we forgive those who
trespass against us," he had not halted or equivocated, and he said,
"Whoever did this, I forgive them."
But he acknowledges that it's a struggle to overcome the feelings
of bitterness and revenge that well up, especially as he remembers David's
birthday year by year and loses him all over again:
David at twenty, David at twenty-five, David getting married, David
standing at the back door with his little ones clustered around his knees,
grown-up David, a man like himself, whom he will never know.
Forgiveness is never going to be easy.
Each day it must be prayed for and struggled for and won.
He will gather us around, all around
He will gather us around
By and by
You and I
He will gather us around
Reading
I love the opera.
I love the way it captures essential human conflicts: love or hate,
compassion or vengeance, redemption or condemnation. All of life’s deepest struggles are in this opera.
Guided by Heggie’s probing music, it takes us into places of our
hearts that we don’t even know we have.
I was amazed watching my story unfold on the stage – but I’m
only a window: through my journey the audience goes on its own spiritual
journey. In the prologue
everyone is witness to an unspeakable crime and everyone knows who did it,
and then when we meet him, brash and unremorseful, we want to see him
executed for his terrible crime. There
is no question as to guilt or innocence, so all the energy of the audience
gathers around the outrage we feel about the crime and wanting to see
“justice” done. But when
the killer’s mother begins to sing before the Board of Pardons for her
son’s life, we are all brought into a terrible moral dilemma: by killing
the killer are we achieving “justice” or are we creating another
victimized family? I could
hear the audience breathing. And
then, as “justice” is enacted before our eyes and e all witness the
execution of the killer (an opera with a minute and a half of silence),
our moral dilemma is compounded. So
now the state has killed in our name – and where are we now?
Have we achieved “justice” and cleansed ourselves, or have we
become crass imitators of violence, killing the killer?
I love the opera because it is clean and spare and
pure and brings us into the deepest recesses of our own hearts.
At heart, the opera is about the search for redemption –
everybody’s redemption. That’s
mostly why I am so moved by it. From
the beginning I told McNally and Heggie that I’d trust them to compose
the opera if they wove into its center the quest for redemption.
—Sr. Helen Prejean
|